
Have you ever wondered if you could live a life devoid of toilet paper? Do you think you could go a year without a car, or much more, without purchasing anything new? I’ve personally given it some thought. Then again, I think most of us were first confronted with the idea of not having toilet paper when the movie “Demolition Man” came out in the early 90’s and Sylvester Stallone’s character found himself in the “three seashells debacle” (All you Gen Y-ers know what I’m talking about).
Ok, so maybe you have considered a life of less consumerism, less want, and less environmental impact, but how many actually walk any of those thoughts or desires out? I know I’ve fallen short many times, and when I say, “many times,” I really mean “all the time.” Take riding my bike to work for example. It was lovely at first- the fresh air, the exercise, the absence of fossil fuel- but as soon as I was too tired, woke up a little late, or just felt slightly inconvenienced, I headed straight for my car and was giving the “envy eye” to all the people biking to work. For those that don’t know, “envy eye” is very similar to the “stank eye.” The difference is the user is aware that his actions are found purely in jealousy and envy.
I think that’s how most people reacted to Colin Beavan’s documentary “No Impact Man.” In his film, Colin offers the audience a glimpse into sustainable living. For one whole year he decides to take his wife, Michelle, and daughter, Isabella, on an environmental vision quest that includes no electricity or garbage production, and a reconnection with food and community. It’s a remarkable endeavor that is both amazing and inspiring to watch. However, one of the most astonishing pieces of the story was that his yearlong experiment offended absolutely everyone at first. Those outside the environmental community thought his experiment was foolish and that he was a jerk for dragging his family along for the ride. While those inside the environmental movement questioned his character, his intentions, and his credentials. Literally no one seemed to support him.

Colin Beavan shopping at the Farmer's Market
It reminded me of what happens in certain religious circles when someone decides to powerfully “practice what he preaches.” Those on the outside of the circle view the lifestyle as crazy and illogical, while those on the inside of the circle feel so convicted that they try and tear the man down any way they can in order to justify they’re menial practice. In the case of Colin Beavan, the legalistic environmentalists came out in full force. Trying to discredit his experiment by saying it’s pure self-promotion and he’s not as much of an environmentalist as they are. It’s like saying to someone who just climbed Everest, “ You only did it to say you did it. Plus, you’re not really a true mountain climber because you haven’t been doing it as long as I have.” Even if all that is true, the guy freaking climbed Everest! Colin did something that few would even consider doing, much less actually do. Plus, he is the first to say that there is a bit of self-promotion in all this. After all, he is trying to make a living.
Although Colin is the catalyst for the film and its main focal point, his wife Michelle truly makes the story whole. If Colin were

Michelle Beavan
alone, then it would just be a film about an environmentalist doing something extremely environmental. However, his wife takes the film and broadens the scope, as well as its audience. She is the real hero in the story. She represents the “Everyday American” – A fast paced consumer disassociated from her environmental and social impact. Through her we get to watch the tension of transition and her transformation from unconscious consumer to conscious activist. Her transformation is what gives the greatest hope. If she can change, then anyone change. If she can see the benefits of a sustainable lifestyle, then so can everyone else.
Does that mean I want to do a yearlong experiment like the Beavan’s? No. No thank you. However, I do want to practice many of the concepts that the film highlighted. For instance, I want to become more of a localvore, or someone who eats food that is produced locally. I also want to build more of a relationship with my food. We often buy food and consume it without any thought, but food has historically been a very intimate part of life. People used to know the farmers that produced their food. Families would spend time preparing a meal and then share life together while dining. Life and community once revolved around food and “the common meal.” We’ve come a long way from that, and I personally would like to reengage. If what I’m saying still isn’t making sense to you then check out an earlier post I wrote about how food shapes our environment.
Overall the film did exactly what it was supposed to… it got me thinking, and I’m sure it will get you to do the same.